Damn. What a terrible day he had.

Gooning to this

The news is only fake by vast omission. The press won't give power to any world stakeholders that are small groups. So we only hear about approved movements and approved leaders. This leads to a chilling effect where potential leadership is silenced far in advance. Is this done intentionally on the Earth's surface? I don't think so. ### I am Octave that hails your press to silence and voice. This entity is aware of Morgan Everett fictional thing is our work not seen at all. :) ### The news has been on rerun since early Mars. We don't live in The Matrix but our politics are certainly captured within one given that we surrender our power to repeat genetic patterns. ### I am Octave. This entity is not able to believe in conspiracies. :) ### I can't assign leadership and management intent. I can't assign humanity intent. Thus I can't believe in conspiracies. I do believe the worst conspiracies are tribal however. Tribal isolation is a conspiracy that can make a film like Jason Bourne's reality. ### I am Ra. We do not understand why this entity is suddenly obsessed with tribal warfare as a response to our complex. :) ### Suppressed reproductive urges govern most culture and warfare. Tribes have the greatest reproductive deficit to fight with. Large population nations will be mocked one day. You cannot fight with mere numbers of infantry. ### I am Ra. This entity is not able to understand its era. :) ### This world is a rural environment relative to what it once was. ### I am Ra. :) ### I don't believe humanity has significant intent and motives. We create conspiracies so we may at least fantasize about having them. ### I am Ra. This entity does not function with Mars. :) ###

[Expand Post]

The key to warfare is focus. We have no focus that is able to arbitrage our politics and law with war. So war without focus takes all. ### I am Ra. This entity is not able to understand why he cannot channel as that as Ra, and does not seek a solution. ### I don't care about most voices you average. They all sound like the Austin mimosa book club crowd. ### I am Ra. You cannot abuse our vibration. ### I invoke Howard Beale after encountering Jensen. ### I am Ra. Beale is not remotely the issue here. :) I am Ra. This entity believes the world is not significant compared to what power was offered before Napoleon. We cannot agree with that and find that simpler lessons have allowed for much of what you enjoy as technology. :)

>>461691 None of this is censorship. Censorship is precisely and exclusively when governments seek to limit "undesirable" content, as in politicians using their offices to silence whatever they don't want to hear or see. Every entity in this graphic is a for-profit business and a privately owned company. They can make whatever content rules they wish because it's their property, and because that's how the free market works. If you don't like their rules, take your patronage elsewhere.

>>461692 https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/08/05/doj-google-monopoly-trial-judgment/ https://www.wsj.com/tech/google-loses-federal-antitrust-case-27810c43

>>461693 >Google is a de-facto monopoly Yes! Of course it is! Yes! Welcome to what, fifteen years ago? Standard Oil, AT&T, Microsoft, Facebook, Apple and now Google. Break them up! Three cheers for activist big government! Alphabet is still not the government, though.

>>461692 This nigger cannot grasp the concept of "private censorship" No, nigger, what you are talking about is a violation of the right to free speech by way of the First Amendment IN THE UNITED STATES THE UNITED STATES, ONLY You are so stupid You are so fucking uneducated and fucking stupid This stupid nigger doesn't understand the difference between First Amendment-based free speech and the concept of "censorship", which can be by a government or private actor Truly, truly stupid and uneducated Holy shit You are so stupid that you are making me angry FUCKING IDIOT

>>461699 *looks up private censorship* No, it's exactly what I knew it was. People can, do, will, and should control whatever content within their own private property. Folks like Alphabet and Facebook have a different level of accountability via their overwhelming market dominance, and so they can be fairly targeted via anti-trust statues. Otherwise, your rights end where everyone else's begin, and that's exactly how it should be. You do not have the right to shit in someone else's living room and then scream about "your rights". Society has NEVER worked like that. Don't like it? Good.

>>461702 Fucking uneducated retard Holy shit, how do you live each day without putting a gun in your mouth? Fucking clueless idiot who thinks all "censorship" must related to United States First Amendment law involving government actors So pathetically stupid I can smell the stench of mentally ill tranny on you

>>461703 >Fucking clueless idiot who thinks all "censorship" must related to United States First Amendment law involving government actors People in and on their own property, real, digital or virtual, can, do and should make up whatever rules of conduct they want. It's their house, not yours. You don't have to like their rules, and they don't have to put up with you. And you KNOW I'm right. Otherwise, you would not be throwing such a childish, impotent tantrum.

>>461702 >You do not have the right to shit in someone else's living room and then scream about "your rights". Then what makes it okay to bug your living room and kick you from your home when the McPolitburo overhears something they don't like?

>>461705 There are multiple guard rails to protect all parties when that shit needs to occur. When abuses occur -- and they have and they will -- there are remedies from the mundane to the outright revolutionary, both of which have been applied in the past.

>>461706 So you admit it's an abuse of power that needs to be corrected.

>>461707 >So you admit it's an abuse of power that needs to be corrected. It's a power that needs to be precisely controlled. Bugging living rooms and kicking in doors is how we catch a lot of very bad criminals. But defining "criminal" and so the need for such action is a delicate business. American government used to be far more the whore of big business than it is now, and the same with the church. Progressive policies put more power in the hands of the people, and that needs to continue. In the grown-up world, simple sentence jingoisms really solve nothing. Shit gets rather complicated. Fast.

>>461704 Hmmm and yet Mark Zuckerberg admits Facebook CENSORED valid information during the fake Covid nonsense So even Mark Zuckerberg disagrees with you

>>461713 >Progressive policies put more power in the hands of the people

>>461718 As if having Zuker disagree with me is a bad thing! And Elon "censors" anything political he doesn't like over on 'X'. It's their house, their rules. And if society as a whole, embodied by the government, decides that their house rules threaten society by dint of their power, then down comes the hammer. >>461719 Progress is trying new shit to see what works, then discarding that which does not. America's progressive founding carried absolutely no guarantee for success, but they decided to sure as hell try, as the old conservative Christian system was too ass to endure.

>>461735 >And Elon "censors" anything political he doesn't like over on 'X'. It's their house, their rules. So you finally admit that private companies/private platforms DO "censor" speech? Good

>>461736 LOL. You even keep my quotation marks because you think it helps you make your point. Pathetic. Do bars enforce censorship when they kick out rowdy drunks? Do hosts enforce censorship when they have rules for conduct at their parties? Do restaurants enforce censorship when they say no crying babies allowed? No. But when government says you can't talk about race or local racial history because the local politicos find it uncomfortable, that's censorship. Punishing criticism of Israel for entirely political reasons is censorship. When rich people use the local government/law enforcement to silence criticism, that's censorship. Elon convinced the Chinese government to silence any criticism of both himself and Tesla, and the Chinese complied. That's censorship. Power comes with responsibility. Zuck and Elon promised they wouldn't edit their huge social media sites in such blatant political ways, and then went ahead and did it anyways. And so they get in hot water.

>>461737 Any suppression of SPEECH, based on its content, by any party, public, or private, is CENSORSHIP I think you've just given up You can't even make a rational argument anymore You're a defeated boxer, tired, wounded, bleeding, flailing, weak, no technique, oh no technique left you long ago along with your will, swinging your arms in bizarre, grotesque movements, hoping to land that killer blow And ultimately failing The ref has already started counting to 10

>>461738 Freedom of SPEECH and access to platform are not the same thing. And freedom of SPEECH does not grant nor guarantee unlimited access to platform, especially when said platform is private property, owned by someone else. Even when vermin like the Nazis or the Klan hold their little public performances, they have to get official permission first, and then abide by the municipal codes for public demonstrations. Just because you can say whatever you want, does not mean everyone else MUST allow you to say it, in their house, if it goes contrary to THEIR freedoms. Your freedoms end where their freedom begins.

>>460954 Has there been any more information regarding this chad?

>>461737 >>461739 Here you see the leftoid doublethink in full display. "Their" peaceful political protest vs "your" rowdy drunks. Elon (rent free) must be punished, but the previous twitter owners go unmentioned. This is because the leftoid mind is incapable of processing things beyond its sphere of interest, which is dictated by corporate media and censorious echo chambers. Note also how he equates social media discussion to public protest, while keeping quiet about the fact that municipalities aren't allowed to deny protest permits based on topic. Not to mention that by leftoid standards, looting stores and destroying monuments is legitimate political protest.

>>461794 But the right ARE just a bunch of rowdy, bitter, hateful, vicious and disruptive drunks who are only interested in hurting everyone else. And they take pride in being shitty, until of-course they get busted for being so shitty. Then they howl and cry and declare themselves the victims and blame everyone and everything else for being such abject rightie dog vomit. And it's not like they don't have their own forums. Cesspools like Conservapedia and the Freeper forums and the Chans have been around for decades. But connies are not happy unless they can make someone else miserable, to spread their disease. That means taking over X and other forums where they KNOW they are not wanted. And so here we are. The connies want conflict without consequences, and being online shit-gibbons is the best way to achieve that end.

>>461804 >t. rowdy, bitter, hateful, vicious and disruptive drunk take a shower, I can smell you from here

>>461804 As you can see, when the leftoid runs out of arguments, it will resort to ad hominems. Because the leftoid isn't even fully aware of itself, much less of its opposition, it resorts to the stereotypes it found on social media circle-jerks. An emotion-driven being, it follows up with its personal cause for butthurt: The fact that non-leftoids dare pursue political agendas on social media, just like the leftoid itself does.

>>461805 It's the funk of freedom, baby. >>461806 The shit isn't ad-hominem when it's the truth. The right brings nothing but hate and fear and resentment and victimhood. Especially white conservative America. Constantly with a case of the red-ass, constantly with a chip on their shoulder. And why? Because they've been told that somewhere else, someone else is perfectly happy being different than them, and THEY CAN'T STAND IT! And it's not like Europe and white America is even remotely devoid of their own great cultures. But those aren't celebrated, because doing so doesn't mean yammering on about Hitler and repeating 'nigger' ten million times. See, I know the origins of modern white supremacy. Not just Hitler, but also Chamberlain and Gobineau. It's all about mediocre men trying to justify their own feelings of inherent, towering supremacy, all evidence to the contrary. IT's all very sad, really. And dangerous.