First look at live action Hiccup Horrendous Haddock & the leaked teaser trailer. Two things of note. First being obviously it's just a repeat of the first movie. Second is that they're hiding the supporting cast. Because they made Astrid black.

>>42136 >Creature Commandos The trailer looked interesting. >>42140 Seriously? HTTYD is not that old. How desperate are these companies for money?

>>42141 I wish it wasn't just Suicide Squad again. Gotta milk a successful franchise. Especially after the cheaper sequel streaming show failed spectacularly. I don't see this succeeding either when the much better movies exist. Unlike Percy Jackson where the original movies aren't very good but then the Disney+ show isn't exactly faithful either. Still those fans are much more desperate.

>>42141 They're doing a live action Moana remake, and that's even newer.

When has any of these live action adaptations actually broke bank?

>>42144 Aladdin & Lion King.

>>42144 Jungle Book. That's why they're doing all of them. >>42146 Didn't everyone hate Aladdin? There are also tons of other ones people forgot about entirely, like Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, and even Pete's Dragon. Also, they did a live action Jungle Book in 1994 that I remember liking at the time, but nobody remembers that one, either.

>>42140 >Because they made Astrid black. Nico Parker is a mutt but anyway the live-action cast stink like crony mangling. Tuffnut will be cast by a fat woman. Now I want fat woman on a dragon jokes >>42147 >>42146 I don't think those Disney films count they got caught doing cooking the book at the time.

>>42147 India loved Aladdin. >>42148 A mutt is still not white. Ruffnut is also a travesty for being fat when she's a sticc.

>>42147 >That's why they're doing all of them. I thought the reason they made these remakes was so they could push them to replace the originals on streaming, letting them pay significantly less royalties.

>>42150 Don't they all just go on Disney+ anyway? I assume Disney doesn't have to pay royalties to put a movie they made in 1939 on their own streaming service.

>>42136 Moon Girl or COON Girl getting shitcanned because of one character becoming a tranny and the whole matrix considering her as a living mistake will unintentionally be the funniest fucking thing conceived by Nigflix.

I was tired of capeshit back in 2006 when it was mostly comic books and cartoons. When will it die?

>>42154 There were tons of capeshit movies in 2006. Superman Returns and X-Men 3 were two major ones that year. If you look back to the rest of the decade before that, the trend was already huge. Two X-Men movies, two Spider-Man movies, a Punisher movie (not counting the '80s one since it was before this boom), a Hulk movie (again not counting those TV movies since they were before the boom), a Fantastic Four movie, Catwoman, Batman Begins, Daredevil, Elektra, and I'm sure more I'm forgetting. Also Blade, but casuals didn't even realize Blade was Marvel, and just saw it as a cool action vampire movie. And that Man-Thing movie, but I don't think casuals even realized that existed. The point is, I hate when people act like the current boom started with Iron Man. Iron Man was just one more superhero movie among many. Nerds thought it was cool when the second Hulk movie (which casuals figured was a sequel) had a cameo to establish a shared universe. (The Spider-Man tv show that tied into the movies already had Michael Clark Duncan Kingpin to establish it as a shared universe with Daredevil.) But really it wasn't until Thor and Captain America, characters casuals wouldn't care about on their own or due to their stars (no RDJ comeback star-power) that they had to market more on the shared universe and promise of the upcoming Avengers movie and people really started to care about the MCU as a thing. The superhero movie boom started way earlier. And of course there were the Batman movies in the '80s and '90s and Superman movies in the '70s and '80s, but I won't say they started massive superhero movie booms. They had their own influence, but not specifically for making superhero adaptations, or at least not as many. Batman might have influenced things like The Crow, The Phantom, The Saint, and The Spirit (the movies. I know several of these characters predate Batman), but that's not quite the same as X-Men obviously directly influencing Spider-Man, Daredevil, Punisher, Fantastic Four, Ghost Rider, Iron Man, etc. >When will it die? It died after Endgame. Everything since is its rotting corpse. The HIV that was Captain Marvel became full-blown AIDS after Endgame.

>>42155 >It died after Endgame. Everything since is its rotting corpse. Come on anon, nobody gives a pig's shit about "when it died spiritually" cope, he's asking when it ENDS. No more movies being made. Finally actually dies and stops moving. Any less and it's still alive.

>>42157 Sony has someone actually made some money with Venom Last Dance despite the reviews & Kraven is on the way next. DC's rocky future is still up for debate. Marvel's on the way out with every flop. They can't survive on only occasional success like Deadpool & Wolverine.

>>42159 >>42157 The MCU is dying. Since Endgame there's been only a handful of movies that actually made money, most notably Guardians of the Galaxy 3 and Deadpool & Wolverine, both of which don't really offer much room for exploitation. Even Venom they capped it off with this last one, since the Sony Marvel Universe got effectively kneecapped by the monumental flop that was Morbius. Now Disney has the same with the Marvels, so there's not much gas in the tank for capeshit. Which it had a near thirty year run, so I think it can finally die now.

>>42160 The Marvels didn't even make money. They all opened the door for the multiverse which is Marvel's plan with or without Kang.

This is supposed to be live action Astrid. See any BIG differences?

>>42161 I meant to compare the Marvels to Morbius, but I can see I didn’t do a good job at making the connection.

>>42164 It's funny that even Morbius for all it's failures has a place in the public consciousness The Marvels does not.

>>42163 She doesn't look nigger to me (judging by her hand), but maybe that's just the lighting. Still, long hair brunette instead of short blond hair is odd.

>>42167 She's a mulatto. But they didn't even go through the trouble of actually giving her straight hair or dyeing it.

>>42157 >nobody gives a pig's shit about "when it died spiritually" cope, he's asking when it ENDS. No more movies being made. Finally actually dies and stops moving. Any less and it's still alive. Oh. Then the answer is "never." Even if things slow down even further, do you really think it will go to a lower level than we had in the '80s and '90s? I'd argue the boom started with X-Men, but there were Superman and Batman movies in a long chain for over 20 years before that. And I mentioned other Batman-esque films in the '90s that I bet people complaining would lump in with capeshit. They're gonna keep making Ninja Turtles movies forever. Are they capeshit? They're not gonna stop making Batman movies ever. So long as that continues, will we say that the capeshit trend has never died?

>>42157 >>42179